Abortion in Ancient Civilizations
In ancient civilizations like Egypt, Greece, and Rome, abortion was often seen through a practical or medical lens rather than a moral or ethical one. It was used for reasons such as “family planning” or “population control”, with techniques involving herbal remedies or early forms of surgery. For example, Aristotle in Greece suggested abortion could be justified to manage family size. In Rome, abortion was sometimes practiced to “preserve resources” or “prevent poverty”, with little regard for the life of the unborn child.
However, even in these ancient practices, the inherent value of life from conception is clear. Some cultures, like the Babylonians and Assyrians, imposed legal penalties for causing miscarriages. This highlights the recognition, even in ancient times, that life begins in the womb and deserves protection. The pro-life movement today views these early practices as evidence of humanity’s long-standing, though often neglected, duty to protect the vulnerable, particularly unborn children.
Child Sacrifice
The following content may be disturbing to some viewers.
Throughout human history, civilizations have engaged in the practice of child sacrifice, often to appease their gods or ensure prosperity. Two prominent examples are the ancient Canaanites, who sacrificed children to Moloch, and the Incas, who performed child sacrifices during the Capacocha rituals. While these practices varied in their execution and purpose, they shared a tragic disregard for the sanctity of human life. Both cultures believed that such sacrifices were necessary to secure divine favor or ward off disasters, often at the cost of innocent lives.
From a Christian perspective, the sanctity of life is paramount. The Bible clearly condemns human sacrifice, especially the offering of children, as it violates God's divine law and profanes His holy name. In Leviticus 18:21, God instructs the Israelites, “Do not give any of your children to be sacrificed to Moloch, for you must not profane the name of your God.” These practices not only rejected God's commandments but also treated human life, a gift from God, as disposable. This disregard for the value of life is echoed in modern times through the issue of abortion, which Christians view as a continuation of the same harmful mindset that undermines the inherent worth of every human being, especially the most vulnerable.
One of the most horrific and abominable rituals practiced by the Canaanites was child sacrifice, specifically to the deity Moloch. Worshippers believed that sacrificing their children would appease Moloch, securing prosperity or protection from disaster. This practice, rooted in polytheistic paganism, involved the passing of children through fire, sometimes even throwing them into the heated arms of a bronze statue designed to consume them. The Valley of Hinnom, near Jerusalem, became infamous for these rituals, as referenced in the Bible.
Child Sacrifice to Moloch:
A Tragic Practice and Biblical Condemnation
Depiction of Moloch
This gruesome practice was repeatedly condemned by God in the Old Testament. The Bible sternly warns the Israelites to avoid these pagan rituals, which defile the sanctity of life. The most explicit prohibition comes from the Book of Leviticus:
Leviticus 18:21 states,
"Do not give any of your children to be sacrificed to Moloch, for you must not profane the name of your God. I am the Lord."
Furthermore, Leviticus 20:2-5 emphasizes the severe consequences for engaging in such practices, commanding the death penalty for those who participate. God’s stance is unequivocal: human sacrifice, especially of children, is a vile act that desecrates His holy name. This was not merely a violation of divine law but an affront to the sacredness of life that God imbued in humanity.
A map of the Valley of Hinnom
The Bible documents how the Israelites occasionally fell into these practices under the influence of neighboring cultures. Even King Solomon, known for his wisdom, is said to have erected altars to Moloch during his reign (1 Kings 11:7). Later, King Josiah would destroy these altars as part of his reforms (2 Kings 23:10), attempting to eradicate the heinous practice from among God’s people.
Archaeological evidence also supports the prevalence of child sacrifice in ancient cultures. Sites such as Tophets, graveyards containing urns with the remains of sacrificed children, have been uncovered, especially in Carthage, a Phoenician colony. These findings align with historical accounts of child sacrifice to Baal and Moloch.
Capacocha
Incan Child Sacrifice:
Rituals of Honor and Devotion
The Incan Empire, one of the largest pre-Columbian civilizations, performed various rituals to honor their gods and maintain “cosmic balance”. One of the most significant and somber practices was child sacrifice, a ceremony known as Capacocha. Unlike the brutal nature of some sacrificial rites in other cultures, Incan child sacrifices were conducted as part of sacred ceremonies intended to please the gods, prevent disasters, or mark important events, such as the death of an emperor or the occurrence of natural disasters.
In Capacocha ceremonies, children were considered pure and thus ideal offerings to the gods. Selected for their beauty, health, and innocence, these children were taken from their homes to the empire's capital, Cuzco, where they were honored, feasted, and prepared for their final journey. The sacrificial children, often drugged with coca leaves and alcohol, were transported to remote, high-altitude sites in the Andes mountains. Here, they were either left to die of exposure or sometimes killed through suffocation or a blow to the head.
Cultural and Religious Significance
In Incan belief, these children were not simply killed but were thought to ascend to the realm of the gods, becoming divine intermediaries between the gods and humanity. Sacrificing children was considered an honor, not just for the individual, but for the family and the entire community. The children were mummified naturally by the freezing conditions of the Andes, preserving their bodies for centuries.
One of the most famous discoveries of Incan child sacrifice is the Children of Llullaillaco. Discovered in 1999 on a 6,700-meter-high volcano on the border between Chile and Argentina, these mummies include a 15-year-old girl known as the "Llullaillaco Maiden" and two younger children. These children were exceptionally well-preserved, with skin, hair, and even internal organs intact due to the freezing temperatures at such high altitudes. Their remains provided insight into their final moments, revealing that they had been drugged with coca and alcohol in the months leading up to their death.
The Inca believed that the mountains, or Apu, were sacred deities, and placing offerings at the mountain peaks helped to maintain balance between the spiritual and natural worlds. Sacrifices were often made during times of crisis, such as droughts, volcanic eruptions, or after the death of a leader. Through these rituals, the Incas sought to secure divine favor for abundant harvests, safety, and prosperity.
The ancient practices of child sacrifice to Moloch and in Incan Capacocha rituals serve as stark reminders of how societies can be blinded by fear, superstition, or the desire for control over the future, even at the cost of innocent lives. In both cases, children were sacrificed under the belief that such acts would secure divine favor or protect against calamities. These practices, however, stand in sharp contrast to the Christian understanding of the sanctity of life. From the earliest pages of Scripture, God makes it clear that human life is sacred and should be protected, especially the lives of the vulnerable.
This belief in the inherent value of life extends to the modern pro-life movement, which opposes abortion as a violation of the same principles. Just as child sacrifices in ancient times were seen as necessary for societal well-being, abortion is often justified by modern societies on similar grounds of convenience or necessity. However, every life, whether unborn or born, has intrinsic worth, and practices that seek to terminate innocent life are seen as moral failures. Through understanding both historical and modern examples of devaluing life, we are reminded of the need to protect and uphold the sanctity of all human life, affirming that it is a gift from God that must be cherished, not sacrificed.
Ancient Egypt
Abortion in Ancient Egypt was a medical practice detailed in some of the earliest known texts, such as the Ebers Papyrus and the Kahun Gynaecological Papyrus. These documents reveal the Egyptians' knowledge of herbal remedies and techniques for terminating pregnancies. From a historical perspective, these practices provide valuable insight into the medical advancements of the time. However, the normalization of abortion in ancient cultures like Egypt raises ethical concerns about the sanctity of life. While ancient societies may have treated abortion as a perceived solution to reproductive issues, pro-life advocates emphasize the inherent value of life from conception, a view not reflected in ancient medical texts.
Kahun Gynaecological Papyrus (c. 1850 BCE)
Ebers papyrus (c. 1550 BCE)
Abortive Methods in Ancient Egypt
The Ebers Papyrus (circa 1550 BCE) and the Kahun Gynaecological Papyrus (circa 1850 BCE) are two primary sources that mention abortion. These texts detail various methods for terminating pregnancy, largely through the use of herbs and natural substances. One common recipe involved the use of ingredients like acacia, colocynth, dates, and honey. These substances were applied either orally or topically to induce miscarriage. Colocynth, in particular, had abortifacient properties but was also highly toxic and dangerous to the woman if used improperly.
The Kahun Gynaecological Papyrus, considered one of the oldest medical texts, also discusses contraceptive methods and treatments for gynecological diseases. It includes a range of suggestions for controlling fertility, such as the use of crocodile dung mixed with other ingredients, which was thought to prevent conception or induce abortion. Other methods involved fumigation with herbs or applying specific ointments directly to the reproductive organs.
Cultural and Medical Context
In Ancient Egypt, there was no apparent social stigma associated with abortion, and it was generally treated as a medical issue. Women in Egypt enjoyed relatively high social status compared to other ancient civilizations, and they had some degree of autonomy over their reproductive health. The Egyptians viewed pregnancy and fertility through a practical lens, focusing on maintaining health and ensuring family stability. Abortion was not only a means of controlling family size but also a method to address unwanted pregnancies or health complications.
Unlike in later periods, there is little evidence to suggest that abortion was legally or morally condemned in Egyptian society. Instead, it was part of the broader spectrum of medical treatments available to women. However, surgical abortion does not appear to have been practiced, as Egyptian physicians preferred non-invasive methods and avoided gynecological surgery.
Abortion in Ancient Egypt was an accepted part of medical practice, with detailed methods preserved in historical texts. While these practices illustrate the Egyptians' advanced understanding of herbal medicine, they highlight the absence of recognition of the unborn child's inherent value. Ancient societies like Egypt may have viewed abortion as a “solution” to reproductive issues, but today, pro-life advocates stress the importance of preserving life from conception. By looking at history through this lens, we can better understand how attitudes toward life have evolved and why protecting life at all stages is so deeply significant in modern times.
Ancient Greece
Abortion in ancient Greece was not universally forbidden. In fact, in many cases, it was legally permissible. However, the authority to decide whether to proceed with an abortion often rested not with the woman, but with her husband or, in the case of a slave, her master. This arrangement reflected the deeply patriarchal structure of Greek society, where a woman’s body was viewed largely as a vessel for producing heirs or maintaining family lineage. The father of the child often had more say than the mother over whether a pregnancy would continue.
In Athens, for example, abortion was legally allowed, but only with the father’s consent. This view aligned with the belief that the fetus was not yet fully human until it had developed into a more recognizable form. In fact, some Greek medical texts, like those attributed to Hippocrates, provided instructions on how to perform abortions through methods such as blood-letting and herbal remedies. These procedures were often carried out in the early stages of pregnancy, reflecting the legal and social permissibility of the practice in its early phases.
The following video offers an artistic depiction of societal structure and daily life in Ancient Greece, specifically Athens:
Medical Practices and Beliefs
Greek medicine, particularly as influenced by Hippocrates and other early physicians, did not view the fetus as having the same moral or legal standing as a born person. This understanding is evident in the medical techniques used to induce abortions. Abortifacient herbs and surgical methods were widely discussed in medical writings, which indicated that abortion was an accepted, albeit controlled, practice. However, the methods themselves were risky, reflecting the limited medical knowledge and tools available during the time.
The medical community’s relative acceptance of abortion contrasts with the more spiritual or philosophical approaches that came later, especially with the rise of religious doctrines that would condemn the practice. In ancient Greece, the practical concerns of family size, inheritance, and population control often took precedence.
Abortion in ancient Greece, while legally permissible and socially accepted, presents a historical reflection on the evolving understanding of human life. Greek philosophers and medical practitioners viewed the fetus as a being whose status changed throughout development, but these views contrast sharply with a pro-life perspective that emphasizes the sanctity and protection of all life from conception. Today, the pro-life movement challenges ancient and modern justifications for abortion by advocating for the rights of the unborn, recognizing that life, regardless of its stage, holds inherent value and deserves protection. The ancient Greek perspectives offer a window into early ethical reasoning, but they fall short of acknowledging the full dignity and worth of every human life.
Ancient Rome
Abortion in Ancient Rome presents a striking example of how societies have grappled with complex issues surrounding life, pregnancy, and reproductive rights. The Romans viewed the fetus as part of a woman’s body until birth, granting it no independent rights. This perspective facilitated the development of numerous abortion methods, including the use of over 200 known abortifacients. These methods were often employed for social and economic reasons, as women in various strata of society sought to manage family size, maintain social status, or avoid financial hardship. Medical experts like Soranus and Dioscorides played key roles in advancing these practices, documenting methods that ranged from herbal remedies to physical exertion.
The Roman view and treatment of unborn life raise critical moral and ethical questions. While abortion was socially accepted, the lack of recognition of the fetus as a distinct human life is a stark contrast to the belief that life begins at conception, as affirmed in Christian teachings. The pro-life movement emphasizes the inherent value of every human life, even in the womb, urging societies to protect and nurture life at all stages.
At the same time, Roman culture as a whole reflected a disturbing disregard for human dignity. The Colosseum stands as a vivid symbol of this brutality, where gladiatorial games turned violence and death into entertainment for tens of thousands of spectators. Public executions, animal hunts, and staged battles normalized cruelty as a form of spectacle.
Crucifixion, one of the most excruciating methods of execution ever devised, further revealed the empire’s harshness. Reserved for slaves, rebels, and the marginalized, crucifixion was designed to prolong suffering and publicly humiliate victims as a warning to others. Together, these practices highlight a society that, despite its advancements, consistently devalued human life, whether in the womb, in the arena, or on a cross.
In this context, the Christian message that every person is made in the image of God and worthy of dignity and protection was revolutionary. It challenged the culture of death that surrounded Rome and laid the foundation for a radically different ethic, one that continues to inspire the pro-life movement today.
Early Christian Views on Abortion
The Early Christian response to abortion was a significant departure from the prevailing norms of Greco-Roman society. In a world where the value of individual life was often subordinate to the needs of the state or family, early Christianity distinguished itself by its consistent commitment to protecting vulnerable populations, including the unborn. While Greco-Roman society, influenced by philosophers such as Plato and Aristotle, regarded abortion as a practical tool for population control or economic stability, the early Church condemned it as a serious moral wrong, rooted in its belief in the inherent sanctity of all human life.
As Christianity expanded beyond the Roman Empire into Europe, North Africa, and the Near East, these views on the protection of life were carried with it. Over time, Christian teaching on the value of life began to influence legal codes, social norms, and cultural attitudes in diverse regions. The conviction that life from conception should be safeguarded not only set Christianity apart from contemporary cultures but also helped shape the development of broader ethical frameworks across much of the Western world and beyond.
Early Christian Texts
Early Christian teachings strongly emphasized the sanctity of life, which stood in direct opposition to the Greco-Roman norms of the time, where abortion and infanticide were often tolerated. Several foundational Christian texts explicitly condemned abortion, reinforcing the idea that life begins at conception and must be protected. The Didache and writings from prominent Church Fathers such as Tertullian, Athenagoras, and Basil of Caesarea exemplify this early Christian stance against abortion.
The Didache
The Didache (circa 1st century A.D.), one of the earliest Christian instructional texts, offers direct guidance on Christian ethics, including a prohibition against abortion. In its second chapter, it states: "You shall not murder a child by abortion nor kill what is begotten" (Didache 2:2). This declaration reflects a consistent teaching within the early Christian community that abortion was considered a form of murder. The text's emphasis on protecting life from the moment of conception illustrates the Christian belief that human life is sacred from its earliest stages.
Tertullian
Tertullian (c. 160-225 A.D.), a prominent early Christian apologist, strongly condemned abortion in his writings. In his Apology, he argued that life begins at conception, stating: "For us, murder is forbidden once and for all, so even the child in the womb is not an object of destruction" (Apology 9:8). Tertullian believed that both the physical body and the soul are formed at conception, which made abortion morally equivalent to murder. His defense of the unborn was based on the Christian view that all human life, regardless of its stage, holds intrinsic value.
Athenagoras
Athenagoras of Athens (c. 133-190 A.D.), in his plea to the Roman emperor, condemned abortion as an act of murder. In A Plea for the Christians, he argued: "We regard the very fetus in the womb as a created being, and therefore object to any form of murder" (A Plea for the Christians 35). Athenagoras connected the Christian belief in the sanctity of life with the condemnation of abortion, reinforcing that life begins at conception and must be protected.
Basil of Caesarea
Basil of Caesarea (c. 330-379 A.D.), one of the most influential early Church Fathers, was also explicit in his condemnation of abortion. In Letter 188, he wrote, "A woman who deliberately destroys a fetus is answerable for murder... there is no fine distinction as to its being fully formed or unformed" (Letter 188). Basil's teachings emphasized that abortion, at any stage of pregnancy, was an act of killing, aligning with the Christian view that all human life is sacred and must be preserved.
Early Christian texts and teachings reflect a deep commitment to the sanctity of life, with a clear condemnation of abortion. The Didache, alongside the writings of Tertullian, Athenagoras, and Basil of Caesarea, established a theological foundation for the Christian pro-life ethic, which continues to influence Christian thought to this day. These early Christian teachings remain a significant aspect of the Christian pro-life stance, emphasizing the protection of the unborn and the inherent value of all human life.
Roman Practices vs. Early Christian Ethics
In ancient Rome, abortion and infanticide were not only tolerated but, in certain contexts, legally and culturally accepted. The Roman legal concept of patria potestas, which gave the father absolute authority over his household, including the power to decide whether a newborn child should live or die, reflected the society's deeply entrenched views on life. While Roman culture accepted such practices, early Christian texts and teachings stood in sharp contrast, unequivocally condemning both abortion and infanticide.
Roman Norms and the Concept of Patria Potestas
Patria potestas (literally "power of the father") was a fundamental concept in ancient Roman society, granting the male head of a family, paterfamilias, absolute authority over his household, including his wife, children, and slaves. This legal and social power was deeply embedded in Roman law and culture, shaping how Romans understood family dynamics, property, and even life and death decisions.
Roman society was highly structured and patriarchal, with the paterfamilias functioning as the central figure of both the family unit and its legal identity. Roman law codified the rights and privileges of the paterfamilias as foundational to maintaining social order, reflecting the importance of family as the primary unit of Roman life.
The absolute nature of patria potestas mirrored the hierarchical structure of Roman society at large, where authority was centralized and absolute power rested in the hands of the elite, including senators and emperors. In many ways, the father’s role within the household was a microcosm of the broader Roman state, where power was concentrated in the hands of a few individuals who governed the fates of many.
The concept of patria potestas had a direct impact on practices such as abortion and infanticide. Fathers had the legal right to "expose" infants, a practice that involved abandoning unwanted children, typically in public places like hills or crossroads, where they would either die from exposure or be picked up by strangers and raised as slaves or laborers. This practice, though not universally approved, was accepted in Roman society.
Infanticide was seen as a pragmatic solution to family planning, especially in cases where a child was born with disabilities or was one of many daughters in a family hoping for a son. Abortion was similarly used to prevent the birth of unwanted children, although it was often seen as a private, even shameful, matter rather than one openly discussed in public life.
Christian Challenges to Roman Practices
Early Christians, in sharp contrast to Roman norms, rejected the notion of patria potestas in its extreme form, particularly when it involved the taking of innocent life. Christians believed that life belonged to God alone, and no human, including the father, had the right to decide the fate of another human being, especially the unborn or the vulnerable newborn. Early Christian texts condemned abortion and infanticide as violations of divine law, asserting that every life, from conception, bore the image of God (Genesis 1:27) and was therefore sacred.
By rejecting abortion and rescuing exposed infants, Christians acted as a countercultural force within Roman society. Christian charity and adoption of abandoned children directly challenged the authority of the paterfamilias and subverted Roman societal norms that viewed human life as disposable under certain circumstances. In doing so, Christians emphasized the value of life, mercy, and familial care, values that starkly contrasted with the prevailing legal and cultural practices of Rome.
Over time, as Roman society and legal systems evolved, the extreme powers granted to the paterfamilias became more regulated. Under the influence of Christianity and other philosophical movements that emphasized the intrinsic value of human life, Roman law gradually placed more restrictions on the power of the father. By the late Roman Empire, practices like infanticide became less common and more widely condemned, both socially and legally.
Christian Care for Vulnerable Populations
In the early days of Christianity, believers lived out their faith by caring for the most vulnerable members of society. Central to Christian teaching was the belief that all people, regardless of their social status, were made in the image of God and therefore deserving of dignity, care, and protection. This conviction led the early church to practice radical generosity and compassion, particularly for widows, orphans, and pregnant women, those often neglected or marginalized in ancient Roman society.
Care for Widows and Orphans
One of the key ways early Christians demonstrated their care for the vulnerable was by supporting widows and orphans. Widows were among the most destitute members of society, as they often lacked the legal and financial means to support themselves. In response, the early church took seriously the biblical mandate to care for widows (James 1:27). Widows were given a place of honor within Christian communities, with many congregations providing them with regular financial support and ensuring their needs were met (Acts 6:1-4). Orphans, who similarly lacked protection and provision, were often taken into Christian households, with the church advocating for their adoption or fostering to provide them with a family structure.
.png)
Christ Blessing the Children (1820 AD)
Painting by: Antoine Ansiaux
Support for Pregnant Women and Mothers
The church also played a significant role in caring for pregnant women, who often faced dangerous or uncertain futures in a culture that lacked medical support for childbirth and encouraged practices like abortion and infanticide. Early Christians stood against these practices, offering practical support to expectant mothers and advocating for the value of every life. By providing financial aid, food, and shelter to pregnant women, they enabled these women to give birth and care for their children in environments that upheld the sanctity of life. This support extended to young mothers as well, ensuring they had the resources needed to raise their children.
Establishing Charitable Institutions and Hospitals
The early Christian response to vulnerability went beyond individual acts of charity and developed into organized systems of care. By the fourth century, Christians began to establish some of the first hospitals and charitable institutions. These facilities were created to provide medical care not only to the Christian community but also to anyone in need, reflecting the Christian belief in extending compassion to all people. Basil of Caesarea, for example, founded a large complex in the fourth century that included a hospital, shelter for the poor, and homes for the elderly and orphans. These early institutions laid the foundation for modern hospitals and charitable organizations.
Early Christian Hospital
Financial Support for the Vulnerable
The early church also developed a communal system for collecting and distributing financial support for vulnerable populations. Believers would donate money, food, and goods to a communal fund, overseen by church leaders, which was then used to care for widows, orphans, and others in need. This practice was an expression of the Christian belief that wealth was a gift to be used for the benefit of the entire community, particularly the most vulnerable. Paul, in his epistles, frequently encouraged believers to contribute to collections for the poor (2 Corinthians 8-9), highlighting the importance of generosity in the Christian life.
The early Christian commitment to caring for vulnerable populations was a powerful witness to the transformative nature of the Gospel. By providing for widows, orphans, pregnant women, and the sick, the early church embodied the teachings of Jesus, who called his followers to love their neighbors and serve the least among them. This care for the vulnerable became a hallmark of the Christian community and laid the groundwork for the development of hospitals, charitable institutions, and ongoing financial support for those in need, demonstrating that faith in action could transform both individuals and societies.
Opposition to Pagan Practices and the Defense of Life
Beyond the Greco-Roman context, early Christians also found themselves in opposition to the prevailing practices regarding life in other cultures, such as those in ancient Egypt and certain indigenous tribes in Africa and Asia, where abortion, infanticide, and other life-ending practices were common. These practices were often rooted in religious or cultural beliefs rather than mere utilitarianism. One striking example is the opposition of early Christians to the infanticide practices in ancient Carthage, a Phoenician civilization in North Africa, which was notorious for its child sacrifice rituals.
In Carthage, child sacrifice was a central feature of religious practice, particularly in the worship of the god Baal-Hammon. Archaeological evidence and historical accounts suggest that Carthaginians sacrificed infants and young children to appease their gods, often during times of crisis or to secure favor in future endeavors, such as military victories or abundant harvests. The ritual, known as molk (not to be confused with sacrifices to the ancient god Moloch), involved the burning of children in sacrificial ceremonies, which were believed to ensure the community's prosperity.
Early Christians, informed by the Jewish prohibition against child sacrifice (Leviticus 18:21), vehemently opposed these practices. The early Church saw child sacrifice as a grievous sin against God and humanity, violating the sacredness of life. The practice of molk deeply disturbed early Christians, who believed that every child, like every person, was made in the image of God and thus had an inherent dignity and worth. Early Christian writings and sermons condemned the Carthaginian practices as not only morally wrong but also as part of the pagan darkness that Christianity was meant to overcome.
Children Tophets in Carthage (graves)
Christian Opposition to Carthaginian Practices
Church Fathers like Tertullian and Augustine, both of whom were from North Africa, spoke out against the cultural norms of their time, which included these sacrificial rituals. Tertullian, in particular, who lived in Carthage during the second and early third centuries, is known for his sharp criticism of pagan practices. He often compared the moral uprightness of Christianity to the barbarity of Carthaginian rituals, emphasizing the Christian commitment to the protection of all life, especially the vulnerable. In his writings, he pointed to the absurdity of sacrificing children in the hopes of gaining favor from deities, arguing that such acts were against both natural law and God’s divine order.
Augustine of Hippo, writing later in the fourth and fifth centuries, also highlighted the contrast between Christian moral teachings and the pagan practices that had been widespread in his region. Although the practice of child sacrifice had largely died out by Augustine’s time due to the growing influence of Christianity and Roman laws outlawing such acts, Augustine’s writings reflect a strong sense of Christian moral superiority in having overcome these pagan rites. For Christians like Augustine, the defense of life was not just a rejection of ancient barbarity but an expression of divine love and the protection of the weak.
Portrait of Tertullian (1584 AD)
Saint Augustine (1650 AD)
Painting by: Philippe de Champaigne
In opposing the practices of cultures like the Carthaginians and Romans, Christians established a moral code that viewed life as inherently valuable. This was part of a broader Christian ethic that opposed the destruction of life in all its forms, whether through child sacrifice, abortion, or infanticide. This stance was not simply a rejection of paganism, but a reflection of the Christian belief that life is a gift from God. By advocating for the protection of all human life, Christians not only distanced themselves from the surrounding cultures but also sought to transform society through their example of love and compassion.
Abortion in Medieval and Renaissance Europe
Shifting Views on Abortion
The transformation of attitudes toward abortion in Europe from the early medieval period to the Renaissance reflects a complex interplay of religious, legal, and philosophical developments. In the early medieval period, views on abortion were shaped primarily by the remnants of Roman law and local customs, which often tolerated early-term abortion, particularly if it occurred before "quickening," the point at which fetal movement is detected. However, as Christian doctrine gained prominence, the Church began to exert significant influence on both moral and legal perspectives concerning abortion.
Christian theology played a critical role in this shift. By the 4th and 5th centuries, early Church fathers, such as Augustine and Jerome, expressed the belief that life was sacred from the moment of conception, though there was still ambiguity surrounding the moral status of the fetus before ensoulment. The Church's views on abortion began to solidify as it gained greater authority across Europe, particularly with the Scholastic influence in the High Middle Ages. Thinkers like Thomas Aquinas expanded on earlier teachings, asserting that ensoulment occurred at a certain stage of fetal development but still condemning abortion as a grave sin, regardless of the timing.
Legal changes also mirrored this growing religious influence. Early medieval law codes were often lenient, reflecting pre-Christian attitudes, but by the 12th and 13th centuries, legal reforms aligned more closely with Christian doctrine. Ecclesiastical courts took on greater authority, and canon law began to explicitly prohibit abortion at any stage. This legal stance further hardened during the Renaissance, when the Church’s moral teachings were woven into broader legal frameworks, emphasizing the sanctity of life as a divine mandate. Renaissance humanism, with its renewed interest in classical philosophy, also contributed to this shift by promoting a more holistic understanding of human dignity.
The philosophical and legal evolution during this period underscores the increasing moral weight placed on the act of abortion, influenced by the Church’s growing dominance and a more refined understanding of natural law.
Early Medieval Period
In the Early Medieval period, abortion was condemned by the Christian Church as a serious moral violation, often intertwined with broader concerns about sexual sin and the sanctity of life. Guided by canon law and penitential codes, early medieval Christianity considered abortion a grave sin, linking it to other transgressions such as adultery and sexual immorality. The Church viewed both the act of abortion and the circumstances surrounding it, often involving illicit sexual relationships, as offenses that required penance and correction.
The concept of ensoulment, rooted in ancient Greek philosophy and later adopted by Christian theologians, played a key role in shaping the Church's stance on abortion. The idea of ensoulment referred to the moment when the soul entered the body, traditionally thought to occur at some point after conception. Early medieval thinkers, influenced by Augustine and later by Aristotle, debated whether ensoulment happened immediately after conception or at a later stage of fetal development. The timing of this event impacted the moral gravity of abortion in canon law.
A significant marker in this regard was the notion of "quickening," the point at which the mother could feel fetal movement, which was generally thought to signify that the fetus had developed enough to be considered a living being. Canon law and penitential codes imposed stricter penalties for abortions performed after quickening, as it was believed that the soul had entered the body at that stage. However, abortion before quickening was still considered sinful, though the penalties might be lighter, reflecting the view that the fetus had not yet fully developed into a human person.
Penitential books, which were manuals used by priests to assign appropriate penances for sins, detailed various punishments for abortion depending on the circumstances. These punishments could range from long periods of fasting and exclusion from the sacraments to more severe forms of penance for cases involving later-stage abortions. The Church's emphasis on penance and reconciliation underscored its belief in the sanctity of all life, even before birth, while also recognizing degrees of moral culpability based on the fetus’s development.
Cherubim, Tree of Penitence & Ladder of Twelve Virtues
Penitence, as a Knight in Armour & the Three Graces
Abortion in the Early Medieval period was thus seen through a moral and spiritual lens, with varying penalties depending on the perceived status of the fetus and the context of the abortion. The practice was deeply condemned as part of a larger framework of Christian ethics, reinforcing the idea that life, in all its stages, was sacred and deserving of protection.
High Medieval Period
During the High Medieval Period, especially the 12th and 13th centuries, abortion was increasingly scrutinized and regulated both by the Church and secular authorities. Theological and philosophical developments during this time, notably the influence of thinkers like Thomas Aquinas, contributed to a more formalized and nuanced understanding of abortion, its morality, and its legal consequences. Aquinas and his contemporaries drew heavily on the works of Aristotle, particularly regarding the concept of delayed ensoulment, to define when abortion constituted murder and when it was considered a lesser but still sinful act. These intellectual currents were codified into law, both ecclesiastical and secular, during the later medieval period, creating a more explicit criminalization of abortion.
The Influence of Aristotelian Thought and Delayed Ensoulment
Thomas Aquinas, one of the most influential theologians of the 13th century, integrated Aristotelian philosophy into Christian theology. Aristotle's notion of delayed ensoulment, derived from his understanding of embryology, played a crucial role in shaping medieval views on abortion. According to Aristotle, the soul was infused into the developing human at different stages: a vegetative soul first, followed by an animal soul, and finally a rational soul. This progression meant that human personhood did not begin immediately at conception but was instead seen as a process culminating in quickening, the moment when the mother first felt the fetus move, typically around the 40th day for males and 80th day for females.
Aquinas embraced this Aristotelian framework, positing that while life existed from conception, full human ensoulment, and thus human personhood, did not occur until the soul entered the body at the point of quickening. Therefore, while Aquinas condemned abortion at any stage as sinful, he reserved the classification of abortion as murder only for those occurring after quickening. Pre-quickening abortion, though considered a grave sin, was not equated with homicide but rather treated as a violation of natural law and an impediment to potential human life.
Legal Codifications of Abortion
The theological distinctions made by Aquinas and other medieval thinkers influenced both ecclesiastical and secular law. Before the High Medieval Period, abortion was often condemned in broad terms, but the specifics of punishment varied. By the 12th and 13th centuries, however, abortion became more explicitly criminalized under both canon law and civil codes.
Page from medieval manuscript of the Decretum Gratiani
The Church, particularly through the establishment of Gratian's Decretum and later canon law collections, began to address abortion with greater specificity. Gratian’s influential Decretum (circa 1140) categorized abortion as a sin, but it did not explicitly label all abortions as homicide. In line with Aquinas' ideas, the Decretum distinguished between pre-quickening and post-quickening abortions, reflecting the Aristotelian understanding of delayed ensoulment. Ecclesiastical courts, which had increasing jurisdiction over moral and ethical matters, could excommunicate those involved in abortions, and harsher penalties were applied in cases of post-quickening abortion, sometimes even considering them under the purview of murder.
Secular law, though initially more lenient in many regions, gradually mirrored these Church teachings. By the 13th century, certain European territories had begun to explicitly outlaw abortion at any stage, with post-quickening abortions often treated as a form of homicide. Medieval legal codes such as the Sachsenspiegel (Saxon Mirror) and the Schwabenspiegel (Swabian Mirror) provided secular punishments, including fines or imprisonment for abortion, particularly in cases where the unborn child was perceived as "ensouled." However, like the Church, many secular laws differentiated between pre-quickening and post-quickening abortion, reserving harsher penalties for the latter.
Renaissance Period
The Renaissance period, spanning roughly from the 14th to the 17th century, was an era of great intellectual, cultural, and societal transformation in Europe. As part of this transformation, attitudes toward life, morality, and governance underwent significant changes, particularly under the influence of the Catholic Church during the Counter-Reformation. Abortion, which had long been a topic of moral debate, became subject to stricter regulations as the Church sought to assert its authority over matters of life and death. The papacy, in response to rising concerns over social morality and governance, began to take a more rigid stance on abortion, culminating in the 1588 papal bull Effraenatam issued by Pope Sixtus V, which categorized abortion at any stage as homicide and imposed excommunication as the penalty.
Counter-Reformation
The Counter-Reformation, a movement initiated by the Catholic Church in response to the Protestant Reformation, played a crucial role in this shift. In its effort to combat Protestantism and reassert its spiritual and moral authority, the Church sought to unify and standardize its teachings on key issues, including abortion. One of the most significant moments in this transformation came with Pope Sixtus V’s papal bull Effraenatam in 1588. This document marked a dramatic departure from earlier views, categorizing abortion at any stage as a grave sin equivalent to homicide, regardless of the point of ensoulment. The decree explicitly stated that anyone who procured or performed an abortion, regardless of the fetus's development, would be excommunicated.
Pope Sixtus V Papal Bull (1586)
Courtesy Museum of the Bible Collection. All rights reserved. © Museum of the Bible, 2020.
The shift in the Church’s stance on abortion during the Renaissance can be seen as a reflection of broader societal concerns. Europe was increasingly focused on governance, law, and moral order, as emerging nation-states sought to consolidate power and maintain social stability. As part of this, the Church emphasized the sanctity of life, underscoring its role in maintaining moral authority over the populace. The rigid position taken by Pope Sixtus V was not only a theological assertion but also a political statement, as the Church sought to exert influence over matters of life, death, and personal behavior. By categorizing abortion as homicide, the papacy reinforced the sanctity of life and aligned itself with broader efforts to establish clear moral and legal boundaries in a society that was becoming increasingly concerned with governance and ethical conduct.
Emphasis on Humanism
The Renaissance emphasis on humanism and the value of individual life contributed to this stricter view on abortion. As scholars and theologians explored the dignity of human beings, the beginning of life became a subject of heightened importance. In this context, abortion came to be viewed not only as a moral issue but also as a violation of human dignity. The Renaissance's intellectual environment, combined with the Church's Counter-Reformation agenda, thus led to a more uncompromising stance on the protection of life from conception.
In conclusion, the Renaissance period saw a significant shift in attitudes toward abortion, driven largely by the Catholic Church’s desire to assert moral and theological authority during the Counter-Reformation. Pope Sixtus V’s 1588 papal bull Effraenatam marked a turning point, categorizing abortion as homicide at any stage of pregnancy and enforcing excommunication as punishment. These changes reflected broader societal concerns with governance, morality, and the sanctity of life, as Renaissance Europe increasingly sought to define and regulate moral behavior in the context of a rapidly changing cultural and political landscape.
Artistic Reflections on Life and Morality
Medieval and Renaissance art in Europe played a significant role in reflecting Christian views on life and morality, with a deep focus on themes such as sin, judgment, and the sanctity of life. While direct depictions of abortion were rare, the moral values embedded in Christian theology were ever-present, shaping artistic expressions that emphasized humanity’s connection to God, the eternal consequences of sin, and the sacredness of human life. Artists like Giotto, Hieronymus Bosch, and Michelangelo used their works to convey these religious ideas, providing a visual narrative of life’s moral dimensions.
Giotto’s Last Judgment
One of the key medieval works that addresses these themes is Giotto’s Last Judgment (c. 1306), a fresco in the Scrovegni Chapel in Padua, Italy. Giotto’s masterpiece is a powerful depiction of Christ’s return and the final division of souls into the blessed and the damned. The saved are shown entering heaven, while the damned are condemned to the torments of hell. This imagery reflects the Christian belief in divine judgment, highlighting the consequences of moral choices made during life. By illustrating sin and its eternal punishment, Giotto’s work served as a moral warning to medieval audiences, urging them to live according to Christian virtues. In doing so, it indirectly emphasized the sanctity of life, portraying the eternal value of a soul aligned with God’s will.
Hieronymus Bosch’s The Garden of Earthly Delights
During the Renaissance, this moral focus continued but evolved with the period’s growing interest in humanism and the complexities of human nature. Hieronymus Bosch’s The Garden of Earthly Delights (c. 1490–1510) is a vivid and surreal triptych that offers a complex exploration of morality, sin, and human destiny. The central panel shows a chaotic scene of indulgence and pleasure, while the right panel depicts the torments of hell, reserved for those who succumb to temptation. Bosch’s portrayal of moral decay through excess and sensual pleasure serves as a cautionary tale against sin. The work’s grotesque and fantastical imagery reflects the consequences of living a life detached from moral and spiritual truths, in direct contrast to the Christian ideals of self-discipline and sanctity.
Michelangelo’s Creation of Adam
.jpg)
Michelangelo’s Creation of Adam (1512), painted on the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel, is another Renaissance masterpiece that encapsulates the Christian understanding of life’s divine origin and sacredness. The iconic image of God reaching out to give life to Adam illustrates not only the physical creation of humanity but also the divine impartation of life and soul. This scene reflects the theological belief that life is a gift from God, and as such, it holds intrinsic sanctity. Michelangelo’s depiction of the moment of creation is deeply imbued with Christian ideals, portraying the close relationship between humanity and the Creator and underscoring the belief in the sacredness of every human life from its inception.
Though these works do not directly address abortion, their focus on themes of sin, divine judgment, and the sacredness of life mirrors the moral debates of the time. In medieval and Renaissance Europe, life was seen as a sacred gift, with morality intricately tied to one’s eternal fate. Through Giotto’s Last Judgment, Bosch’s The Garden of Earthly Delights, and Michelangelo’s Creation of Adam, we see reflections of a culture deeply concerned with life’s moral dimensions, offering a rich artistic legacy that continues to inspire reflection on the sanctity of life and human destiny.
The Role of the Church and
Law in Shaping Views on Life
During the Medieval and Renaissance periods, the Catholic Church and monarchies played a profound role in shaping societal views on life, particularly concerning the sanctity of human life and the practice of abortion. As the Church’s influence grew, its teachings increasingly permeated all aspects of life, including moral, social, and legal codes. This transformation, alongside the strengthening of Christian monarchies, redefined European attitudes toward life and led to a more codified protection of the unborn.
Renaissance Humanism and the
Continuation of Christian Teachings
The Renaissance, while ushering in a period of intellectual revival and humanism, did not drastically alter the Church’s stance on life and abortion. Humanist thinkers emphasized the dignity and potential of human life, and many of them were devout Christians who upheld the Church’s teachings on the sanctity of life. Figures like Erasmus and Sir Thomas More, who were both prominent humanists and devout Catholics, supported the notion that life was a divine gift that must be protected at all costs.
In Renaissance Italy, where the papacy held considerable political power, the Church continued to influence legal systems and cultural norms. Laws concerning the protection of the unborn remained stringent, and secular rulers enforced them as part of their obligation to uphold Christian morality. The integration of Christian ethics into the fabric of European monarchies meant that the sanctity of life, including the life of the unborn, was considered a matter of both religious and legal importance.
Abortion in the New World
Native American Practices
Among Indigenous peoples of North America, knowledge of women’s health was preserved and passed down by elders, midwives, and healers. This knowledge included not only pregnancy care and childbirth but also methods to prevent conception or induce miscarriage. Unlike European societies, where abortion was heavily tied to religious law, for many tribes these practices were understood in practical, community-centered ways. Women’s bodies, fertility, and choices were often guided by cultural traditions and the natural resources available to them.
Yellow Bull's Wife (1907)
Abortion Methods
Native women possessed detailed knowledge of the plants in their environment. Certain roots and herbs were believed to affect fertility and pregnancy:
Methods Beyond Plants
In addition to using herbal remedies, some Native communities relied on physical practices to manage fertility and pregnancy. One method involved applying abdominal pressure in an attempt to terminate pregnancies, a practice that carried significant risks but was sometimes employed when herbs were unavailable or ineffective. Extended breastfeeding was another strategy, intentionally used to delay the return of fertility and naturally space out births.
Cultural and Legal Shifts
While some Indigenous traditions allowed space for abortion, others began to outlaw it as external pressures mounted. By the early 1800s, the Cherokee Council banned abortion in 1826, and the Seneca Nation also introduced restrictions. This shift reflects how colonial influence and Christian moral frameworks began reshaping Native law and custom.
Six Navajo on Horseback (1904)
The Cherokee Council, historically the governing body of the Cherokee Nation, served as both a political and community decision-making institution, balancing leadership between peace chiefs, war chiefs, and clan representatives to ensure consensus. Decisions often reflected not only governance but also moral and spiritual matters, as the Cherokee viewed law, community, and spirituality as interconnected. In earlier times, abortion was not handled as a legislative issue by the council but rather as a matter within families, often guided by medicine women who held knowledge of herbal remedies used in cases of social necessity, such as after assault or during times of hardship. However, this changed under the influence of European colonization and Christian missionary presence. In 1826, the Cherokee National Council passed a formal law banning abortion, making it one of the earliest anti-abortion laws in North America. This marked a sharp shift from traditional Cherokee practices of respecting women’s autonomy in reproductive matters to adopting Western-style legal restrictions, showing how assimilation pressures reshaped both Cherokee governance and cultural norms.
The Seneca Nation, as part of the Haudenosaunee (Iroquois) Confederacy, did not originally impose restrictions on abortion in their traditional governance system. Authority over reproduction was understood as part of women’s domain, with clan mothers and medicine women holding both knowledge and authority in these matters. Decisions were viewed through a lens of practicality and survival, not legal enforcement.
Kwakiutl people in canoes, British Columbia (1914)
Restrictions began to emerge later, under the dual pressures of colonization and missionary influence. Christian missionaries, particularly in the 18th and 19th centuries, promoted Western moral teachings that condemned abortion. As Seneca communities became more entangled with U.S. governance structures, through treaties, land loss, boarding schools, and legal impositions, their councils increasingly adopted laws and practices influenced by outside values. By the mid-19th century, U.S. state and federal laws criminalizing abortion also affected Native communities, since enforcement often extended into reservation life. Over time, the Seneca Nation’s traditional autonomy in these matters eroded, and restrictions were either formally introduced under new constitutions (as they reorganized their governments on U.S. models) or indirectly imposed through external legal authority that overshadowed clan-based decision-making.
So, unlike the Cherokee’s explicit 1826 abortion ban, Seneca restrictions emerged more gradually and indirectly—less from a specific tribal law at first, and more from missionary influence and U.S. legal dominance that reshaped their governance and pressured conformity to American legal norms.
Colonial America
As European settlers arrived in the New World, they carried with them not only their traditions, laws, and religious beliefs but also their understandings of life, family, and morality. The colonies became a meeting ground of diverse practices, Native communities already had their own methods and views on pregnancy regulation, while settlers brought over the framework of English common law and Christian moral teaching. This blending of influences set the foundation for how abortion would be understood and handled in early America.
The Colonies
In the American colonies (1600s–1700s), abortion practices and attitudes were shaped primarily by English common law, which drew a sharp distinction between pregnancy before and after “quickening” (when the mother first felt fetal movement, usually around 16–20 weeks). Before quickening, abortion was often tolerated, seen as morally questionable but not treated as a serious crime. After quickening, however, ending a pregnancy could be prosecuted and condemned as taking a human life.
Hidden Practices, Public Morality
Abortions were typically carried out using herbal remedies (such as pennyroyal, savin, or tansy), administered by midwives or women themselves. These methods were widely known, though dangerous, and reflect how pregnancy regulation was largely managed by women within their own communities. Because colonial law enforcement focused on maintaining order and morality rather than regulating private domestic life, abortion cases rarely appeared in court unless they involved death, injury, or evidence of sexual misconduct like adultery or fornication.
Religious influence, especially from Puritan and Protestant communities, framed abortion as a sin against God’s design for family and procreation. Still, the emphasis on quickening meant there was ambiguity: a pregnancy not yet “quickened” was not always treated as the loss of a life. As a result, abortion in colonial America was generally a private, hidden practice, rarely brought into public legal or social scrutiny unless scandal or tragedy made it unavoidable.
Settler's first blockhouse (1870)
From Common Law to Early American Law
With the founding of the United States, lawmakers sought to build a legal system distinct from the old English common law. While colonial practice had tolerated abortion before quickening, the new American legal order moved steadily toward more defined restrictions. This shift reflected both a desire to create independent statutes and a changing cultural climate in which abortion was no longer viewed simply as a private matter but as a social and legal issue.
The Rise of State Statutes
By the late 1700s and early 1800s, states began drafting their own abortion statutes. These laws often retained the language of “quickening,” but they expanded the scope of punishment and scrutiny. Some states criminalized attempts to induce abortion regardless of outcome, while others extended penalties to cover pre-quickening abortions, reflecting a tightening of regulation compared to the looser colonial practices.
Presbyterian Church Etch (1792)
Influences Behind the Shift
-
Religious and moral reform movements – Protestant revivalism and early moral reform societies pressed for laws that emphasized the sanctity of life and stricter standards of personal conduct.
-
Medical professionalization – As medicine became more formalized, doctors increasingly challenged the authority of midwives and traditional healers. By discouraging the use of herbal abortifacients and home remedies, physicians positioned abortion as both a moral danger and a medical risk that needed legal oversight.
-
Population and social concerns – In a young nation focused on expansion, growth, and stability, many saw abortion as undermining both family responsibility and the future of the republic.
A New Legal Culture
The result was a legal culture that treated abortion with greater suspicion than in colonial times. Courts and legislatures began framing abortion less as a hidden domestic matter and more as a public offense. Even when prosecutions remained rare, the very presence of state statutes marked a significant change: abortion was now something that lawmakers claimed authority over, rather than leaving it to individual women, families, or community norms.
By the early 19th century, this transition laid the groundwork for the sweeping wave of criminalization that would spread across the United States in the decades to come. What had once been guided by inherited custom was now increasingly defined, and restricted, by American law.
Preparing for Secularization
At the founding of the United States, religion and politics were closely connected but also deliberately separated. The Constitution (1787) included no religious test for office, and the First Amendment (1791) barred Congress from establishing a national church while guaranteeing free exercise of religion. This framework set the stage for a gradual process of secularization, not the rejection of religion, but the creation of a civic order that was not officially governed by it.
Late 1700s – A Religious but Pluralistic Society
The early republic was still deeply religious, shaped by Protestant values, but the Revolution had encouraged an emphasis on individual liberty and pluralism. Different denominations coexisted, and the new government sought to prevent one faith from dominating the political order. Leaders like Jefferson and Madison promoted the “wall of separation between church and state”, ensuring that the nation’s laws would be grounded in civic rather than theological authority.
Early 1800s – Disestablishment and Moral Reform
Through the early 19th century, many states dismantled their established churches (Massachusetts was the last, ending in 1833). This created a society where religion thrived in the private and voluntary sphere rather than through official state power. At the same time, however, religious revival movements like the Second Great Awakening (starting around 1790s–1830s) spurred widespread moral campaigns, on temperance, family values, and eventually abortion, showing that religion continued to influence culture even without legal establishment.
The Secularizing Trend in Law and Public Life
As the nation matured, its legal framework increasingly emphasized reason, science, and civic order over explicitly religious justification. Universities, medical societies, and professional associations began to replace clergy as authorities in areas like education, law, and medicine. This secularization of institutions laid the groundwork for debates on issues like abortion, where medical and legal arguments started to outweigh purely theological ones.
Page References
Abortion in Ancient Civilizations
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Moloch-ancient-god https://biblereadingarcheology.com/2016/05/13/did-the-canaanites-sacrifice-their-children/ https://www.compellingtruth.org/molech.html https://allthatsinteresting.com/moloch https://morbidology.com/the-incan-child-sacrifices/ https://greekreporter.com/2023/07/24/sacrificed-inca-children-reveal-more-macabre-secrets/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UYKKbhA2_fI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1gEAt4pkPow https://ancientegyptianfacts.com/ancient-egypt-abortion.html https://www.worldhistory.org/video/2840/abortion-in-the-ancient-world/ https://muvs.org/en/topics/termination-of-pregnancy/abortion-in-antiquity-en/ https://www.liverpool.ac.uk/archaeology-classics-and-egyptology/blog/2023/ancient-athenian-women-abortion/ https://www.britannica.com/topic/history-of-ethics/Later-Greek-and-Roman-ethics https://www.biusante.parisdescartes.fr/ishm/vesalius/VESx1995x01x02x077x087.pdf https://www.thetorah.com/article/abortion-in-the-ancient-near-east-and-greco-roman-world https://muvs.org/en/topics/termination-of-pregnancy/abortion-in-antiquity-en/ https://www.liverpool.ac.uk/archaeology-classics-and-egyptology/blog/2023/ancient-athenian-women-abortion/ https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/younghistorians/2023/papers/8/ https://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2002/2002.11.24
Abortion in Medieval and Renaissance Europe
https://daily.jstor.org/what-a-16th-century-abortion-ban-revealed/ https://www.medievalists.net/2022/05/abortion-medieval-law/ https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/abortion-in-the-early-middle-ages-c500900/medicine-for-sin-reading-abortion-in-early-medieval-penitentials/7FA20F4F7F7AA12171004893D8EDB62F https://academic.oup.com/ehr/article-abstract/132/556/668/3793383?login=false https://academic.oup.com/shm/article-abstract/29/4/843/2660192?redirectedFrom=fulltext&login=false https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BZgweyM-dbA&t https://www.catholic.com/qa/did-st-thomas-aquinas-believe-ensoulment-occurred-40-or-80-days-after-conception-making-abortion https://embryo.asu.edu/pages/st-thomas-aquinas-c-1225-1274 https://embryo.asu.edu/pages/effraenatam-1588-pope-sixtus-v https://daily.jstor.org/what-a-16th-century-abortion-ban-revealed/ https://catholicgentleman.com/2014/01/pope-condemns-abortion-in-1588/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Om1jvUzVAtE&t https://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/christianity/christianethics/abortion_1.shtml
Early Christian Views on Abortion
https://www.logos.com/product/50067/abortion-and-the-early-church-christian-jewish-and-pagan-attitudes-in-the-greco-roman-world https://www.crosswalk.com/special-coverage/sanctity-of-life/abortion-and-the-early-church.html https://www.christianpost.com/voices/what-the-early-church-said-about-abortion.html https://www.catholic.com/encyclopedia/didache https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0301.htm https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0205.htm https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/3202188.htm https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qZdOmcfbAwk https://www.britannica.com/topic/patria-potestas https://www.worldhistory.org/article/870/ancient-roman-family-life/ https://www.livius.org/category/roman-empire/ https://www.ccel.org/ccel/tertullian https://reflections.yale.edu/article/no-more-excuses-confronting-poverty/early-christians-and-care-poor https://www.religion-online.org/article/how-the-early-church-practiced-charity/ https://www.britannica.com/topic/Christianity/Church-and-social-welfare https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2014-01-23-ancient-carthaginians-really-did-sacrifice-their-children https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/life-carthage-was-brutal-children-being-sacrificed-wasnt-their-biggest-problem-1615252
Abortion in the New World
https://today.uconn.edu/2022/08/abortion-in-colonial-america-a-time-of-herbal-remedies-and-accepted-actions/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10297561/ https://www.zinnedproject.org/materials/peoples-history-of-abortion-care-in-the-us/ https://virtualgarden.greenspell.org/content/files/2025/01/Ethnobotany-of-the-Menomini-Indians.pdf https://www.plannedparenthoodaction.org/issues/abortion/abortion-central-history-reproductive-health-care-america https://ourbodiesourselves.org/health-info/u-s-abortion-history https://www.nationalgeographic.com/history/article/the-complex-early-history-of-abortion-in-the-united-states https://edhub.ama-assn.org/ama-journal-of-ethics/module/2829863 https://www.americanprogress.org/article/scarlet-letters-getting-the-history-of-abortion-and-contraception-right/ https://www.huntington.org/verso/abortion-american-history https://magazine.publichealth.jhu.edu/2022/brief-history-abortion-us https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi https://oxfordre.com/americanhistory/americanhistory/abstract/10.1093/acrefore/9780199329175.001.0001/acrefore-9780199329175-e-29?d=%2F10.1093%2Facrefore%2F9780199329175.001.0001%2Facrefore-9780199329175-e-29&p=emailA8A9js2GjKLAc https://www.theatlantic.com/photo/2013/04/native-americans-portraits-from-a-century-ago/100489